4WebHelp
 FAQ  •  Search  •  User Groups  •  Forum Admins  •  Smilies List  •  Statistics  •  Rules   •  Login   •  Register
Toggle Navigation Menu

 Iframes
Post New TopicReply to Topic
View Previous Topic Print this topic View Next Topic
Author Message
robert
Junior WebHelper
Junior WebHelper


Joined: 28 Mar 2002
Posts: 20
Location: Heythuysen, The Netherlands

PostPosted: Wed Apr 03, 2002 12:49 pm (15 years, 8 months ago) Reply with QuoteBack to Top

Does Netscape support Iframes, if yes, which is the oldest version supporting it??

________________________________
Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
OfflineView User's ProfileFind all posts by robertSend Personal Message
Darren
Team Member



Joined: 05 Feb 2002
Posts: 549
Location: London

PostPosted: Wed Apr 03, 2002 1:32 pm (15 years, 8 months ago) Reply with QuoteBack to Top

IFRAMES certainly don't work on Netscape 4.7x on Macintosh (I'm sure this will be the same on PC)

I think I'm right in saying the earliest Netscape browser IFRAMES work in is Netscape 6, which I checked and was fine.

Example here if anyone else wants to check:
http://www.wdvl.com/Authoring/HTML/4/Tags/iframe.html
OfflineView User's ProfileFind all posts by DarrenSend Personal MessageVisit Poster's Website
Ben
Senior WebHelper
Senior WebHelper


Joined: 08 Jan 2002
Posts: 431
Location: Liverpool - UK

PostPosted: Thu Apr 04, 2002 2:03 pm (15 years, 8 months ago) Reply with QuoteBack to Top

Yup, no IFRAME support in netscape4.x on the PC either

________________________________
Ben Scott

Red and White Kop
OfflineView User's ProfileFind all posts by BenSend Personal MessageSend emailVisit Poster's Website
robert
Junior WebHelper
Junior WebHelper


Joined: 28 Mar 2002
Posts: 20
Location: Heythuysen, The Netherlands

PostPosted: Thu Apr 04, 2002 6:51 pm (15 years, 8 months ago) Reply with QuoteBack to Top

Yup, thanx guyz, that saved me a 15 mb download (on ISDN... Crying or Very sad ) to check.

________________________________
Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
OfflineView User's ProfileFind all posts by robertSend Personal Message
robert
Junior WebHelper
Junior WebHelper


Joined: 28 Mar 2002
Posts: 20
Location: Heythuysen, The Netherlands

PostPosted: Thu Apr 04, 2002 6:58 pm (15 years, 8 months ago) Reply with QuoteBack to Top

Oh yes, and i know, I SHOULDN'T USE MSIE.... Embarassed

________________________________
Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies.
OfflineView User's ProfileFind all posts by robertSend Personal Message
Robert Wellock
WebHelper
WebHelper


Joined: 18 Jan 2002
Posts: 61
Location: Yorkshire - UK

PostPosted: Fri Apr 05, 2002 2:50 pm (15 years, 8 months ago) Reply with QuoteBack to Top

The Netscape Communicator 4.xx series doesn't support the <iframe> however Netscape/Mozilla 6.xx - 6.22 should I've never tried - on Mozilla - since I use XHTML 1.0 and XHTML 1.1 where possible the later has no support for <iframe>.

________________________________
};-) http://www.xhtmlcoder.com/

Last edited by Robert Wellock on Mon May 19, 2003 4:14 pm, edited 1 time in total
OfflineView User's ProfileFind all posts by Robert WellockSend Personal MessageVisit Poster's Website
Hertzsprung
WebHelper
WebHelper


Joined: 30 Jul 2002
Posts: 56
Location: UK

PostPosted: Fri Jan 10, 2003 1:13 pm (14 years, 11 months ago) Reply with QuoteBack to Top

robert wrote:
Does Netscape support Iframes, if yes, which is the oldest version supporting it??

AFAIK, Iframes are an IE only feature. Sometimes, this will solve the problem:

<div style="width: 300; height: 300; overflow-x:scroll">text goes here</div>

But obviously, you cannot include another webpage like you can with IFRAME.
OfflineView User's ProfileFind all posts by HertzsprungSend Personal MessageVisit Poster's Website
Daniel
Team Member



Joined: 06 Jan 2002
Posts: 2564

PostPosted: Fri Jan 10, 2003 4:27 pm (14 years, 11 months ago) Reply with QuoteBack to Top

Iframes are standard HTML (see http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/present/frames.html#h-16.5), so I think browsers other than IE support them (even though some old versions of Netscape might not - but that's nothing new! Wink).

________________________________
Image
OfflineView User's ProfileFind all posts by DanielSend Personal Message
Darren
Team Member



Joined: 05 Feb 2002
Posts: 549
Location: London

PostPosted: Fri Jan 10, 2003 4:44 pm (14 years, 11 months ago) Reply with QuoteBack to Top

on mac IE5.1 I could only get this working by removing the '-x'

Code:
<div style="width: 300; height: 300; overflow:scroll">text goes here</div>


Doesn't work at all on Netscape 4.7x Sad
OfflineView User's ProfileFind all posts by DarrenSend Personal MessageVisit Poster's Website
adam
Forum Moderator & Developer



Joined: 26 Jul 2002
Posts: 704
Location: UK

PostPosted: Fri Jan 10, 2003 9:18 pm (14 years, 11 months ago) Reply with QuoteBack to Top

mozilla supports them, so they must be right Very Happy

________________________________
It's turtles all the way down...
OfflineView User's ProfileFind all posts by adamSend Personal MessageVisit Poster's Website
Robert Wellock
WebHelper
WebHelper


Joined: 18 Jan 2002
Posts: 61
Location: Yorkshire - UK

PostPosted: Tue Jan 14, 2003 4:19 pm (14 years, 11 months ago) Reply with QuoteBack to Top

Out of interest <iframes> were removed from XHTML 1.1 the <object> element would be the next nearest substitute for the old Netscape 4.xx.

________________________________
};-) http://www.xhtmlcoder.com/
OfflineView User's ProfileFind all posts by Robert WellockSend Personal MessageVisit Poster's Website
Display posts from previous:      
Post New TopicReply to Topic
View Previous Topic Print this topic View Next Topic


 Jump to:   




You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.


Page generation time: 0.053416 seconds :: 17 queries executed :: All Times are GMT
Powered by phpBB 2.0 © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group :: Based on an FI Theme